Skip to content
T

Audio review

Marshall Emberton II Review: Nine Hours, Not Thirty

Marshall claims 30-plus hours. One lab measured 9 hours 8 minutes on a standardised test. The gap is the single biggest thing to understand before buying.

By Paulo GerchonPublished 2 min read

Placeholder graphic, not a product photo

Illustration, not a photo — we don’t have a licensed image of this product yet.

6.7/10

Marshall

Marshall Emberton II

Fair · researched from 3 sources

A genuinely well-balanced small speaker with a control knob better than any app, wrapped in a design people buy on sight. Halve the battery figure in your head, keep the volume under two thirds, and it is easy to live with.

Buy if
Listening at moderate volume in a room, kitchen or garden · Anyone who wants physical controls rather than an app · Wet environments, on the IP67 rating
Skip if
All-day use away from power, given the measured battery · Filling a large space or an outdoor party · Calls, since there is no microphone

The battery claim and the battery measurement

Marshall says 30-plus hours. SoundGuys put it on a standardised test at a fixed output level and recorded 9 hours 8 minutes.

That is not a rounding error. It is roughly a third of the advertised figure, and it is the largest gap between claim and measurement of any product in this catalogue.

The explanation is volume. Manufacturer battery figures assume moderate listening; a fixed loud test level drains any speaker much faster. Reviewers using it casually report figures far closer to Marshall's number, and both things can be true at once.

What you should not do is plan a weekend around 30 hours.

The sound is better than the bass

Mighty Gadget's summary is the fairest one: the bass is the least powerful among its rivals, and it beats them on balance and clarity anyway.

Tech360 describes it as warm and lush with distinct vocals and crisp highs. Both agree the low end is present rather than impressive.

For a speaker this size that is a defensible choice. Small drivers pushed for bass produce the muddy, one-note sound that most portables have, and this one has chosen definition instead.

The cost appears at volume. Tech360 found distortion and unpleasant tonal shifts above roughly 60 percent, and recommended sitting between 50 and 70 percent outdoors. Indoors it is comfortable at full.

What Marshall left out

No microphone. No calls, no voice assistant.

No 3.5 mm input. Bluetooth or nothing, and SBC is the only codec available, which Mighty Gadget lists as a limitation.

No multipoint, so switching between a phone and a laptop means re-pairing.

No custom EQ. The app offers three presets, which Mighty Gadget says differ very little from each other.

The knob is the good part

One multi-directional control on the top handles power, volume, playback and track skipping. It is the opposite of the app, and it is why the speaker is pleasant to use in a kitchen with wet hands.

The other genuine addition over the original is Stack Mode, which links multiple Emberton II units together. Reviewers are lukewarm on how many people will buy two, and the search results note occasional pairing drops, but it exists and the first generation did not have it.

Against the original

IP67 instead of IPX7, so it now resists dust as well as water. A longer claimed battery. Stack Mode.

Mighty Gadget still says the cheaper original remains competitive, and Tech360 says the upgrades are minimal enough that existing owners can skip this one. That is an unusual pair of conclusions for a well-reviewed product, and it is worth weighing the price difference carefully.

How it scored

The overall 6.7 is the weighted average of these five criteria — we never adjust it by hand.

Sound quality

25% of score7.0

Mighty Gadget praises the balance and clarity while calling the bass the least powerful of its rivals. Tech360 finds it warm and lush but reports distortion above about 60 percent volume.

Value

25% of score6.5

SoundGuys scored it 6.6 out of 10. Mighty Gadget gave it 80 percent and notes the cheaper original model remains competitive.

Build quality

17% of score9.0

IP67, up from IPX7 on the original per Mighty Gadget, with a construction that uses 50 percent post-consumer recycled plastic.

Ease of use

17% of score6.0

A single multi-directional control knob and a deliberately spare app. SoundGuys calls the app lean, and Mighty Gadget says the three EQ presets differ very little.

Battery

17% of score5.0

SoundGuys measured 9 hours 8 minutes against Marshall's 30-plus hour claim. Quick charging returns four hours from twenty minutes.

Pros and cons

What we liked

  • Mighty Gadget rates the balance and clarity above rivals despite less bass
  • IP67 rated, an improvement on the original's IPX7 per Mighty Gadget
  • A single control knob that handles volume, playback and track skipping
  • Stack Mode links several units together, which the original could not do
  • Twenty minutes of charging returns about four hours of playback
  • Built with 50 percent post-consumer recycled plastic and no PVC

What we didn’t

  • SoundGuys measured 9 hours 8 minutes against a 30-plus hour claim
  • Tech360 reports distortion and unpleasant tonal shifts above roughly 60 percent volume
  • No microphone at all, so calls and voice assistants are out
  • No 3.5 mm input and SBC is the only codec, which Mighty Gadget lists as a limitation
  • No multipoint, so it holds one device at a time
  • At 0.7 kg it is heavier than most rivals of its size

Specifications

Specifications
Battery30-plus hours claimed; 9 h 8 m measured by SoundGuys
Quick charge20 minutes for about 4 hours; 3 hours for a full charge
Water resistanceIP67
Weight673 g per SoundGuys, quoted as 0.7 kg elsewhere
Dimensions70 x 159 x 70 mm per SoundGuys; 68 x 160 x 76 mm per Mighty Gadget
Bluetooth5.1, SBC only, no multipoint
ControlsOne multi-directional knob
AppThree EQ presets and Stack Mode; no custom EQ
MissingNo microphone and no 3.5 mm input

How we researched this

We have not had this unit on the bench. This review synthesises the manufacturer’s published specifications, independent measurements and owner reports listed below. Every figure on this page comes from one of those sources rather than our own measurement.

3

sources reviewed

SoundGuys is the only source to measure the battery on a standardised test, which is where the 9 hour 8 minute figure comes from, and also supplies the dimensions, weight, codec and connectivity limitations. Tech360 supplies the volume behaviour and the point where distortion begins, and is the source for the description of the sound at ordinary levels. Mighty Gadget supplies the generational comparison, the IP rating change and the criticism of the EQ presets, and scored it 80 percent. The three give slightly different dimensions and weights, and both figures are reported rather than reconciled. No source published a measured frequency response curve for this speaker.

Our full testing policy

Common questions

How long does the Marshall Emberton II battery really last?
Far less than the 30-plus hours advertised, at least under standardised testing. SoundGuys measured 9 hours 8 minutes, which is not a small shortfall but roughly a third of the claim. Their test plays at a fixed, fairly loud output level, so quieter listening will do better, and other reviewers report figures much closer to Marshall's number at low volume. The honest expectation is somewhere between the two, and the safe planning assumption for a day out is well under 30 hours.
How loud can it go before it sounds bad?
About 60 percent. Tech360 is specific, reporting that above roughly that point distortion and unpleasant tonal shifts appear, and that outdoors you will want to sit between 50 and 70 percent depending on background noise. Indoors it is comfortable at full volume in their testing. This is a speaker to be listened to rather than one to fill a garden with, which fits its size.
Does it have a microphone?
No, and none of our sources found a workaround. That rules out speakerphone calls and voice assistants entirely, and SoundGuys lists it as a criticism. There is also no 3.5 mm input, so a wired source cannot be used, and no multipoint, so it holds one Bluetooth device at a time. Marshall has stripped this down to a playback device with a knob on top, which is either the appeal or the problem depending on what you wanted.
Is the app worth using?
Barely. SoundGuys calls it lean, and Mighty Gadget goes further, saying the three EQ presets differ very little and that toggling between them produces subtle effects at best. There is no custom equaliser, so you cannot dial in bass or treble yourself. The one genuinely useful thing in it is Stack Mode, which links multiple Emberton II units. Everything else you need is on the knob.
Should I buy this or the original Emberton?
Mighty Gadget puts it plainly, saying the cheaper original remains competitive, and Tech360 argues the upgrades are minimal enough that existing owners have little reason to switch. What the second generation adds is a longer claimed battery, an IP67 rating in place of IPX7, and Stack Mode. If those three things do not matter to you, the price difference is doing most of the work in the decision.
6.7/10
Fair

The bottom line on the Marshall Emberton II

A genuinely well-balanced small speaker with a control knob better than any app, wrapped in a design people buy on sight. Halve the battery figure in your head, keep the volume under two thirds, and it is easy to live with.

More tech & gadgets reviews

Placeholder graphic, not a product photo
8.0/10

Audio

1MORE SonoFlow

SoundGuys measured almost seven hours beyond the claim. TechGearLab's frequency breakdown shows 36.2 dB of reduction in the highs and 15.6 in the lows.

Placeholder graphic, not a product photo
7.8/10

Audio

AKG K371

Sonarworks measured up to ±4 dB of channel imbalance and ±3 dB of bass variation between units. That is a bigger difference than most of the arguments about how it sounds.

Apple AirPods Max over-ear headphones in space grey with the knit mesh canopy headband and anodised aluminium earcups
6.7/10

Audio

Apple AirPods Max

One lab scored comfort 4.6 out of 10 and found glasses cut wearable time to less than sixty minutes. Everything else about them is very good, which is the frustrating part.