Skip to content
T

Coffee & Espresso review

Breville Smart Grinder Pro Review: Excellent Fine, Argued Over Coarse

Two sources say it is unsuitable for French press. A third tested setting 58 and found a consistent chunky grind. For espresso, all three agree it is very good.

By Paulo GerchonPublished 2 min read

Placeholder graphic, not a product photo

Illustration, not a photo — we don’t have a licensed image of this product yet.

8.3/10

Breville

Breville Smart Grinder Pro

Good · researched from 3 sources

For espresso and pour-over this is the best-value grinder we have found evidence for, and one lab ranked it top of sixteen. The coarse end is where the sources fall out, so if French press is your main method, look elsewhere.

Buy if
Espresso, where all three sources rate the uniformity highly · Pour-over and filter, where TechGearLab measured 83 percent in range · Anyone who wants a grinder that does not shriek
Skip if
French press and cold brew, on two of three sources · Single-dosing, given one to two grams of retention · Anyone who wants to dose by weight rather than time

Where it is unambiguously good

TechGearLab ranked this first of sixteen grinders and gave it their Editors' Choice, with an overall score of 85 out of 100.

Their pour-over test put about 83 percent of grinds inside the desired size range, with extraction times landing between 2:46 and 2:59 against a three minute target, and only a one gram variation in output weight across repeated grinds.

Coffeeness, testing espresso, found grounds extremely uniform between settings 9 and 11 with minimal clumping, and dosing accurate enough to add two grams per second reliably.

For espresso and filter, three sources and one lab test all point the same way.

Where they fall out

Coffeeness: not suitable for French press or cold brew.

TechGearLab: top-notch in every category except the coarsest grinds, where it produces noticeably more fines than other grinders, risking over-extraction.

Coffee Xplore: setting 58 for French press produced a consistent chunky grind that reduced sediment.

Two against one, and the dissenting source is the one that ran the longest test. The most likely truth is that it is usable at coarse settings and beaten there by grinders at the same price, which is exactly the pattern you would expect from conical burrs optimised for the fine end.

If your daily brew is a French press, this is not the grinder for you. If it is an occasional weekend thing, it will do.

The two things nobody mentions before you buy

Retention. Coffee Xplore measured one to two grams staying in the chute and burr chamber, which means the first grams you grind each morning are yesterday's coffee. Irrelevant if you grind for a full pot; disqualifying if you single-dose.

Static. Their 28-day test made this the main daily complaint, with grounds clinging to the plastic bin, worse with dark roasts. Their fix is the Ross Droplet Technique, misting the beans with a little water before grinding, which cut it by around 95 percent.

Coffeeness had less trouble, having ground into the portafilter cradles rather than the bin, which suggests the plastic container is most of the problem.

Sixty settings and a hidden sixty more

The dial gives 60 positions. Inside, the upper burr can be repositioned across 10 micro-adjustments, which multiplies the range and is the answer to Coffee Xplore's complaint that the step between espresso settings 7 and 8 is too large.

It doses by time rather than weight, so consistent output depends on consistent bean density and a consistent hopper level. TechGearLab's one gram variation suggests it manages that well; a scale is still a sensible companion purchase and Coffeeness lists it as a cost.

Quiet, for a grinder

Coffeeness measured 70 to 80 dB and describes a muted purr rather than the high-pitched shriek most burr grinders make. TechGearLab scored noise 8.0.

On a machine used at six in the morning in a house with other people asleep, that is worth more than a couple of percentage points of particle distribution.

How it scored

The overall 8.3 is the weighted average of these five criteria — we never adjust it by hand.

Grind consistency

25% of score8.0

TechGearLab scored consistency 7.8 and got about 83 percent of pour-over grinds in the desired range. Coffeeness found espresso grounds extremely uniform between settings 9 and 11.

Value

25% of score9.0

TechGearLab ranked it first of sixteen grinders and gave it their Editors' Choice. Coffeeness calls it excellent value and says it would satisfy a demanding home barista.

Build quality

17% of score7.0

Stainless steel conical burrs in a body that mixes steel with plastic. Coffee Xplore raises durability concerns about the plastic internal components.

Ease of use

17% of score9.0

TechGearLab scored ease of use 9.4, with 60 settings plus micro-adjustment and only a one gram variation in output across repeated tests.

Noise

17% of score8.0

TechGearLab scored noise 8.0. Coffeeness measured 70 to 80 dB and describes a muted purring rather than the shriek most grinders produce.

Pros and cons

What we liked

  • TechGearLab ranked it first of sixteen grinders tested
  • Coffeeness found espresso grounds extremely uniform with minimal clumping
  • TechGearLab measured only one gram of variation in output across repeated grinds
  • 60 settings plus 10 micro-adjustments through a movable upper burr
  • Coffeeness measured 70 to 80 dB, quieter than comparable grinders
  • Portafilter cradles that Coffeeness found produced minimal static and no spillage

What we didn’t

  • TechGearLab found it produces noticeably more fines at coarse settings
  • Coffeeness says it is not suitable for French press or cold brew
  • Coffee Xplore measured one to two grams of coffee retained in the chute and burrs
  • Coffee Xplore found static a daily problem, particularly with dark roasts
  • It doses by time rather than by weight, so a scale is a separate purchase
  • Coffee Xplore raises durability concerns about the plastic internals

Specifications

Specifications
BurrsStainless steel conical, 40 mm per Coffee Xplore
Settings60 main settings plus 10 micro-adjustments via the upper burr
DosingBy time, not weight
RepeatabilityAbout one gram of variation per TechGearLab
RetentionOne to two grams in the chute and burr chamber per Coffee Xplore
Noise70 to 80 dB per Coffeeness
Hopper18 oz per Coffee Xplore
Power165 W per Coffee Xplore
Weight2.72 kg per TechGearLab
Dimensions31.8 x 21.6 x 41.4 cm per TechGearLab

How we researched this

We have not had this unit on the bench. This review synthesises the manufacturer’s published specifications, independent measurements and owner reports listed below. Every figure on this page comes from one of those sources rather than our own measurement.

3

sources reviewed

TechGearLab tested it against fifteen other grinders and supplies the category scores, the pour-over consistency percentage, the dose repeatability, the ranking and the finding about fines at coarse settings. Coffee Xplore ran a 28-day test and supplies the burr size, the settings count, the measured retention, the static findings and the durability concern. Coffeeness supplies the espresso uniformity assessment, the measured noise range and the portafilter cradle observation. The three disagree about coarse grinding, with two calling it unsuitable for French press and one finding it consistent, and both positions are reported.

Our full testing policy

Common questions

Is the Breville Smart Grinder Pro good for French press?
Our sources disagree, which is unusual for a question this specific. Coffeeness says outright that it is not suitable for French press or cold brew, and TechGearLab identifies the same weakness, reporting that it produces noticeably more fines than other grinders at coarse settings, which can cause over-extraction. Coffee Xplore is the dissent: they tested setting 58 for French press and describe a consistent chunky grind that reduced sediment. The likely reconciliation is that it works but is beaten by grinders costing the same at that end of the range. If coarse brewing is what you do most, this is not the grinder to buy.
How good is it for espresso?
This is where all three agree. Coffeeness found grounds extremely uniform between settings 9 and 11 with minimal clumping, and dose repeatability accurate enough to add two grams per second reliably. TechGearLab measured only a one gram variation in output across repeated tests and scored ease of use 9.4. Coffee Xplore notes the step between settings 7 and 8 is large enough to be awkward for espresso, which is what the internal micro-adjustment on the upper burr exists to solve.
Does it hold onto old coffee?
Yes, and Coffee Xplore measured it. They found one to two grams consistently retained in the chute and burr chamber, which means the first few grams you grind each day are yesterday's coffee. For most people making a full pot that is a rounding error. For anyone single-dosing, weighing beans in for one shot at a time, it is a real problem and the reason Coffee Xplore explicitly says this is not a single-dose grinder.
How bad is the static?
Bad enough to be Coffee Xplore's main complaint over a 28-day test, with grounds clinging heavily to the plastic container, especially with darker roasts. Their fix is worth knowing: misting the beans lightly with water before grinding, known as the Ross Droplet Technique, cut the static by roughly 95 percent in their testing. Coffeeness had a better experience using the portafilter cradles, reporting minimal static and no spillage that way, which suggests the problem is largely about grinding into the plastic bin.
How loud is it?
Quieter than most. Coffeeness measured 70 to 80 dB and describes a muted purring rather than the high-pitched squeal common to burr grinders. TechGearLab scored the category 8.0 and made the same qualitative point. Coffee Xplore compares it favourably against the Baratza Encore. For an appliance used early in the morning in a quiet house, that is a more meaningful daily benefit than a small difference in particle distribution.
8.3/10
Good

The bottom line on the Breville Smart Grinder Pro

For espresso and pour-over this is the best-value grinder we have found evidence for, and one lab ranked it top of sixteen. The coarse end is where the sources fall out, so if French press is your main method, look elsewhere.

More home & kitchen reviews

Placeholder graphic, not a product photo
8.8/10

Coffee & Espresso

1Zpresso JX-Pro

Forty clicks a rotation and more than two hundred settings, on 48 mm burrs that are larger than most electric grinders carry. It weighs 800 grams and you turn it yourself.

Placeholder graphic, not a product photo
7.3/10

Coffee & Espresso

Baratza Encore

Every espresso review tells you the grinder matters more than the machine. This is the grinder they mean, and it is also the one that cannot pull espresso.

Placeholder graphic, not a product photo
7.8/10

Coffee & Espresso

Breville Barista Express

It puts a burr grinder inside the machine, which is why beginners buy it. One reviewer measured dose variation of two to three grams between shots, which is why they outgrow it.