Skip to content
T

Audio review

Audio-Technica ATH-M20x Review: Top Seven, or Save Up?

Sonarworks ranked it among the seven most neutral closed-backs they had measured. SoundGuys said it under-emphasises basically every note and told readers to spend more.

By Paulo GerchonPublished 2 min read

Placeholder graphic, not a product photo

Illustration, not a photo — we don’t have a licensed image of this product yet.

7.6/10

Audio-Technica

Audio-Technica ATH-M20x

Good · researched from 3 sources

The most consistent cheap studio headphone anyone has measured, and one lab rates its neutrality above headphones costing three times as much. The cable is fixed and the pads are divisive, so read the comfort section before committing.

Buy if
Tracking and monitoring on a tight budget · Anyone who wants measured neutrality rather than a flattering tuning · Studios buying several pairs, on the consistency finding
Skip if
Long sessions, on SoundGuys' two-hour limit · Music with critical sub-bass content · Anyone who wants a replaceable cable

Two labs, two verdicts

Sonarworks measured these and placed them among the top seven closed-back headphones they had tested for neutral frequency response, noting they were by far the cheapest of that group.

SoundGuys measured them and concluded they under-emphasise basically every note, scored them 5.8 out of 10, and headlined the review with advice to save up for something better.

Both used a target curve. The curves differ, and so does what each considers the job of a studio headphone.

Sonarworks' detail is the more specific: a conservative high-mid cut and a treble boost of only 5 dB, with bass almost flat down to 60 Hz. SoundGuys' detail is also specific: deviations below 70 Hz and again at 5 kHz and 8 to 10 kHz.

Those are not incompatible descriptions of a headphone that is broadly flat and short of extension at both ends.

The finding that decides it for studios

Sonarworks tested consistency between units, and this is where the M20x does something genuinely unusual: manufacturing consistency is good, deviating pairs are rare, and channel matching blows the far more expensive M50x out of the water.

For a studio buying four pairs for a tracking session, that matters more than a decibel of treble. Every pair sounds like every other pair.

It is also the exact opposite of the AKG K371 elsewhere in this catalogue, where Sonarworks measured up to ±4 dB of channel imbalance between units on a headphone costing three times as much.

And it beats its expensive sibling

Sonarworks' comparison is direct: for studio work, the M20x is arguably a better choice than the M50x, on neutrality and on consistency.

The M50x, also reviewed here, has better isolation, three detachable cables and more comfortable pads. What it does not have is a flat midrange, and a third source called it unsuitable for mixing on exactly that basis.

You can buy three pairs of these for one of those.

Comfort is the coin toss

SoundGuys: 4.8 out of 10, downright uncomfortable after two hours, vinyl pads without enough cushioning.

Sonarworks: adequate for the price, breaks needed after about an hour.

Sound Sight: soft synthetic velvet pads that do not heat the ears even after several hours, comfortable for hours at a time.

Three descriptions, two of them describing different pad materials. The pads are replaceable, so check what is fitted to the pair in front of you, and budget for a velour set if the vinyl is what arrives.

The cable will end them

Fixed. Three metres, with a quarter-inch adapter.

Sound Sight puts the consequence plainly: a cable failure means a new pair of headphones. They otherwise describe these as a purchase for life, with exchangeable pads and headband foam.

On a fifty-euro headphone that is not a catastrophe, and it is still the single part most likely to fail and the only one you cannot fix.

How it scored

The overall 7.6 is the weighted average of these five criteria — we never adjust it by hand.

Sound quality

25% of score7.5

Sonarworks ranks it among the top seven closed-backs they measured for neutrality, with bass almost flat to 60 Hz. SoundGuys measured under-emphasis across most of the range.

Value

25% of score9.0

Sonarworks scored 6.8 uncalibrated and 8.1 with calibration, calling it professional-grade sound at around €50. Sound Sight calls it effective entry-level monitoring gear.

Build quality

17% of score6.0

SoundGuys scored build 6.5 out of 10, calling the plastic cheap, and the cable cannot be replaced. Sound Sight notes the pads and headband foam are exchangeable.

Comfort

17% of score6.0

SoundGuys scored comfort 4.8 out of 10 and found them downright uncomfortable after two hours. Sound Sight says the pads do not heat the ears even after several hours.

Consistency

17% of score9.0

Sonarworks found manufacturing consistency good with deviating pairs rare, and says channel matching blows the far more expensive M50x out of the water.

Pros and cons

What we liked

  • Sonarworks ranks it among the seven most neutral closed-backs they have measured
  • Sonarworks says channel matching beats the much pricier M50x comfortably
  • Bass almost flat down to 60 Hz per Sonarworks
  • SoundGuys confirms no headphone amplifier is needed
  • Sound Sight reports the ear pads and headband foam are replaceable
  • SoundGuys measured about 35 dB of isolation at 8 kHz

What we didn’t

  • The cable cannot be replaced, which both SoundGuys and Sound Sight flag
  • SoundGuys scored comfort 4.8 out of 10 and found two hours the limit
  • SoundGuys measured under-emphasis below 70 Hz and at 5 kHz and 8 to 10 kHz
  • Sonarworks notes bass extension is limited below 60 Hz
  • They do not fold and the earcups rotate only about 15 degrees
  • Sources disagree on weight by 100 grams

Specifications

Specifications
TypeClosed-back, over-ear, wired
IsolationAbout 35 dB at 8 kHz per SoundGuys
Bass extensionAlmost flat to 60 Hz and limited below that per Sonarworks
Weight190 g per SoundGuys; 290 g per Sound Sight
CableFixed 3 m with a quarter-inch adapter
AmplificationNot required per SoundGuys
FoldingNo, and the earcups rotate about 15 degrees
PadsReplaceable per Sound Sight
DistortionHarmless second harmonic below 45 Hz and a spike at 5 kHz per Sonarworks

How we researched this

We have not had this unit on the bench. This review synthesises the manufacturer’s published specifications, independent measurements and owner reports listed below. Every figure on this page comes from one of those sources rather than our own measurement.

3

sources reviewed

SoundGuys supplies the isolation measurement, the frequency response deviations against their own target, the comfort and build scores, the weight and the amplification assessment, and scored 5.8 out of 10. Sonarworks supplies the neutrality ranking, the distortion measurements, the unit-to-unit consistency finding and the comparison against the M50x and M40x, scoring 6.8 uncalibrated and 8.1 calibrated. Sound Sight supplies the pad and build description and a third comfort assessment. The three disagree about neutrality, comfort and weight, and all positions are reported rather than reconciled.

Our full testing policy

Common questions

Are the Audio-Technica ATH-M20x neutral?
Two labs measured and reached opposite conclusions. Sonarworks ranks them among the top seven closed-back headphones they have measured for neutral frequency response, and by a distance the cheapest of that group, describing a conservative high-mid cut and a treble boost of only 5 dB with bass almost flat down to 60 Hz. SoundGuys measured against their own target and found the headphones under-emphasise basically every note, with significant deviations below 70 Hz and at 5 kHz and 8 to 10 kHz. The difference is largely which target curve each lab compares against, and Sonarworks' point stands either way: for the money the response is unusually well behaved.
How do they compare to the ATH-M50x?
Sonarworks makes the comparison directly and comes down on the cheaper headphone for studio use. They report the M20x offering superior neutrality and consistency, and say its channel matching blows the M50x out of the water. That matters because the M50x, reviewed elsewhere in this catalogue, was described by another source as unsuitable for mixing because of its scooped midrange. The M50x has better isolation, a detachable cable and more comfortable pads. For accuracy, the cheaper one wins.
Are they comfortable?
This is the sharpest disagreement here. SoundGuys scored comfort 4.8 out of 10 and says that after two hours they feel downright uncomfortable, blaming vinyl ear pads with insufficient cushioning. Sonarworks calls comfort adequate for the price and recommends breaks after about an hour. Sound Sight describes soft synthetic velvet pads that do not heat the ears even after several hours and allow hours of wear. Since the pads are replaceable, and since the three descriptions of the pad material do not match, it is worth checking what is fitted to the pair you are buying.
Do they need an amplifier?
No. SoundGuys states plainly that no headphone amplifier is needed, which is what you would expect from a headphone designed to be plugged into whatever a studio has to hand. The cable is a fixed three metres with a quarter-inch adapter included, so a desk or a live room is the intended environment rather than a phone in a pocket.
What is the biggest weakness?
The cable cannot be replaced. Both SoundGuys and Sound Sight raise it, and Sound Sight puts the consequence bluntly: a cable failure means buying an entirely new pair. That is the same criticism as the Beyerdynamic DT 990 Pro elsewhere in this catalogue, and it is more serious on a headphone this cheap because the repair is never worth the labour. Sound Sight otherwise calls these a purchase for life with the pads and headband foam being exchangeable, which makes the fixed cable the one thing that will end them.
7.6/10
Good

The bottom line on the Audio-Technica ATH-M20x

The most consistent cheap studio headphone anyone has measured, and one lab rates its neutrality above headphones costing three times as much. The cable is fixed and the pads are divisive, so read the comfort section before committing.

More tech & gadgets reviews

Placeholder graphic, not a product photo
8.0/10

Audio

1MORE SonoFlow

SoundGuys measured almost seven hours beyond the claim. TechGearLab's frequency breakdown shows 36.2 dB of reduction in the highs and 15.6 in the lows.

Placeholder graphic, not a product photo
7.8/10

Audio

AKG K371

Sonarworks measured up to ±4 dB of channel imbalance and ±3 dB of bass variation between units. That is a bigger difference than most of the arguments about how it sounds.

Apple AirPods Max over-ear headphones in space grey with the knit mesh canopy headband and anodised aluminium earcups
6.7/10

Audio

Apple AirPods Max

One lab scored comfort 4.6 out of 10 and found glasses cut wearable time to less than sixty minutes. Everything else about them is very good, which is the frustrating part.